The three questions that actually separate them
Does it read the whole team at once? This is the difference between a Pokédex
and a team builder. Six Pokémon that are each individually fine can still share a weakness, and
the tool's job is to show you the column where three of your six take extra damage and nothing
resists it. Most of the planning tools do this. Showdown, which is the most capable builder in the
category by a distance, does not put it on the team screen at all — its team view is a list and a
Validate button.
Does it know the current regulation? Pokémon Champions launched in April 2026
and Regulation M-B closes on 9 September 2026. A tool that does not track that is
not wrong, it is just answering a different question — and every playthrough planner in the table
is deliberately in that group. A tool that does track it has taken on maintenance work that
expires on a fixed date, which is worth remembering when you see a Champions site that has not
been touched in two months.
Whose numbers is it showing you? Usage percentages come from Smogon's published
ladder statistics; tournament results come from Play Pokémon and Limitless. They are not the same
thing and they do not agree. Ladder usage tells you what you will run into; tournament data tells
you what won. Pikalytics and ChampTeams both carry tournament data. pkmnlab carries ladder usage
only, and says so on every page that prints a percentage.
If you are planning a playthrough team
Pokémon Team Planner
is the one that has been quietly winning this for years. Pick a game, pick six, and the weaknesses
and resistances appear. It is honest about its own limits in a way that is rarer than it should
be: its FAQ states plainly that only typing is used, so abilities like Levitate and Wonder Guard
are not factored in, and that coverage disregards the move pool. Both caveats are true of most
tools in this category; this is the one that writes them down.
Marriland's Team Builder
goes a step further. Advanced Mode takes four moves per Pokémon and the abilities and items that
change a type matchup, so the offensive half of the answer is based on what your team can actually
click rather than on its typing. It covers Generations 1 through 9 including Scarlet and Violet
and Legends: Z-A, shares a team by URL or by a team code, and keeps your work in browser storage.
It has no notion of a VGC regulation, which is a choice rather than an omission.
mypokemonteam.com
covers Generation 6 to 9 and prints Team Defence and Team Type Coverage as two eighteen-type
tallies side by side. Its distinctive feature is the team checklist: entry hazard, spinner or
defogger, reliable recovery, cleric, phazer, boosting move, Volt-turn, choice item. That is a
singles-team frame rather than a doubles one, and nothing else in this table has it. Worth knowing
before you go: it carries a full programmatic advertising stack and analytics — opening it fires
requests to several ad exchanges and identity vendors. That is how it is paid for, and it is
visible in any browser's network panel.
If you are building for Pokémon Champions
Pokémon Showdown's teambuilder
is the reference implementation and the thing every other tool interoperates with. Pick a format,
add six, press Validate and it tells you what is illegal. Every field is there because the
simulator needs every field. It asks nothing of you up front — no account is required to build,
only to save teams to the server — but it also explains nothing, and a player who does not know
what an EV is will not find out here. Its export format is the lingua franca: if a tool in this
category cannot import a Showdown paste, treat that as a serious gap.
ChampTeams.gg is
the most ambitious new thing in the Champions space and is still labelled early access. The
builder carries damage matrices in both directions against the live Regulation M-B meta, speed
tiers that recalculate under Tailwind and Trick Room, and a picker that shows tournament usage
under every name. Its Battle Mode is aimed at the ninety seconds of team preview: paste the
opponent's six, get suggested picks, ability-immunity callouts and a knockout matrix before you
commit. No other tool here is trying to be useful during a game. Its tier list is built
from Play Pokémon and Limitless events cross-referenced with Smogon usage, which is a more careful
sourcing statement than most sites bother with.
Pikalytics is
the research desk. Usage and win rates, set breakdowns, teammates, cores of two, three and four
Pokémon, a speed tier analyser, a damage calculator, and tournament team lists with full effort
and individual value spreads — for Regulation M-A and M-B, and for a long tail of older formats
and Showdown ladders. If you want to know what the format is before you decide what to
build, start here. It runs on advertising with a Ko-fi donation link, which it says on its own
page.
Two more worth knowing about, described from their own pages rather than from a full read:
PokéBase is a
database and roster reference that covers Champions with tournament data and community team lists,
has a builder with team-fit recommendations and a per-Pokémon Auto Build, and ships iOS and
Android apps. PokeSynergy
is a Champions builder organised around Teams, Speed, Analysis and Calcs, with Threats, Cores and
Auto Build panels.
If you just want to know what beats what
pkmn.help is a type
calculator and it is the best one. Type matchups, coverage checked against the whole Pokédex, a
dex viewer with artwork, cries and shiny forms, and an unusually long list of languages. It is
MIT-licensed and open source. It is not a team builder and does not pretend to be: there is no
six-slot team, no legality, no ladder data. If the question in your head is "what is Psychic weak
to", this answers it faster than anything else and then gets out of the way. The equivalent page
here is the type calculator, and it is a genuinely close call.
Where pkmnlab is the wrong answer
This site is one of the eight, so the useful thing to publish is the list of cases where you
should close it and open something else.
- You are about to battle. pkmnlab does not run games. Build here if you like,
export the Showdown paste, and go to Showdown.
- You want tournament data. There is none here. The percentages on this site
are Smogon ladder usage — what people play, not what wins. Pikalytics and ChampTeams both carry
real event results with real spreads, and for the question "what did the top cut actually
bring", they are right and this is not.
- You want help during a match. ChampTeams' Battle Mode exists for exactly
that and there is nothing comparable here.
- You do not read English. Marriland is published in eleven languages and
pkmn.help in many more. pkmnlab is English only.
- You want your teams saved to an account. There are no accounts here, by
design — a team lives entirely in the
?team= part of the URL, which is excellent for
pasting into a Discord thread and useless once you lose the link. Showdown will save teams
across devices; this will not.
- You want a singles role checklist. mypokemonteam's hazard, spinner, cleric
and phazer checklist has no equivalent here, because this site's competitive half is aimed at
Champions doubles.
What is left, and the reason the site exists: one URL that starts in a casual
mode with six slots and an eighteen-column exposure strip and no mention of an effort value,
and turns into a full competitive builder with regulation legality per slot and Showdown
import and export when you press one switch. Every other tool in the table picks a side. That is
the whole claim, and the table above is there so you can decide whether it is the claim that
matters to you.
How this was checked
Every tool in the table was opened in a browser on 30 August 2026 and read.
Nothing in the table is quoted from memory, from another comparison article, or from a press
page. Where a tool states a limitation about itself — Pokémon Team Planner on abilities and move
pools, ChampTeams on being in early access, Pikalytics on being ad-supported — that statement is
reported as theirs.
Two entries, PokéBase and PokeSynergy, are described from their own home pages rather than from
a full read of their builders, and are labelled that way above rather than dropped into the table
as though they had the same standard of evidence behind them.
No tool paid for a place here and none was contacted. There are no affiliate links on this page
or anywhere else on this site, and no advertising anywhere on it. This comparison will go stale —
Regulation M-B closes on 9 September 2026 and at least one tool in the table is shipping features
weekly — so treat the date at the top as the honest expiry rather than as decoration.